Stepping into greatness and out of unhappiness with dynamic goals - Aristotle and Ego Series.
The dynamic goal and your happiness
Am I raising my standards too high by saying you should make it your life purpose to pick up the phone? Or are you thinking that it is stressful to make everything you do into your life purpose?
On the contrary - it is the key to a stress-free life. But let’s tackle the positive side first.
If you are “doing” a dynamic goal, your happiness can never end, for you only stop doing when you want to - and why would you want to, unless you’ve found something even better?
Now: What about unhappiness? Making everything you are doing into your life purpose removes all inner resistance to it. That way you can never hate doing anything again. Isn’t that wonderful?
Back to a more everyday example. A couple days ago, I had agreed to a long and tedious favour for my aunt, typing up some marketing material for her company. Other deadlines were rushing closer, and I was getting stressed and frustrated.
It was building to an unbearable breaking point when I suddenly remembered to see my primary life purpose as typing her marketing material. My secondary life purpose was to help her company achieve success.
Why? Not because she asked me to; not because I was trying to be a good nephew; but simply because that was what I was doing then. It was empowering – the material came out as good as I could make it - and most importantly, I had no inner resistance to it, and it could not make me unhappy. I have covered this before, in this article How to be a rock in a chaotic world.
The misunderstanding of Aristotle
Before we continue, let me return quickly to Aristotle’s works.
I believe a flawed interpretation of his philosophy is the result of much anguish in our society. If you simply look at his works without going in-depth, you will think that unless you have health, wealth, and a perfect body while living the life of your dreams, you are a miserable failure.
His greatest statement is that happiness lies in the doing. Health and wealth, simply allow someone to “do” better and capitalise on opportunity to do so better. This is common sense. But many people make mistaken it to mean that you NEED all those things. You don’t. If your love is to fly, you’ll just as happy flying in a rickety crop duster as you would be in the latest jet fighter.
You are always living your life purpose
Back to the life purpose. Why did I mention that misunderstanding? It causes far deeper pain and misery in the world than my simple example of a favour I didn’t want to do.
I was recently watching a video of Byron Katie working to counsel a depressed woman. The subject’s pain was obvious in her features even though she did her best to hold them in.
She had been sick and grossly overweight, stuck in her room for the past few years. As a result, she felt the same way many of us do - that life has passed her by, and that she had wasted precious years of her youth. She also felt that she was so fat that she couldn’t attract a mate, and would probably die lonely.
Isn’t she a victim of a wrong interpretation of Aristotle, who has possibly influenced most of our current society? Further, her pain comes from her static goal, an image of herself as she should be. Do you recognise any of this pain in yourself?
When she was sitting alone at home with a static goal, she saw herself as a bedridden, hideous hag, dying a slow death, floating further and further away from what she wanted.
It would have been different with dynamic goals. When she was lying in bed, too sick to do anything but watch television, her primary goal was to lie in bed and watch television. Her secondary purpose was to find a mate, and lying in bed as she recovered was the only thing she could do to fulfil that.
With that mindset, she could enjoy the process and not resist it or make it wrong. There is no unhappiness in the search for a lover. There is no unhappiness is being alone, obese, or in bed, except when her thoughts make it wrong. Happiness, as modern medicine is starting to recognise, is one of the best fixes for ill health, and her acceptance would have sped her recovery.
Thinking any other way is the seed of suffering. Resisting what she had to do would be fighting Life, fighting Reality, fighting what is. And you cannot win against life. We have discussed this before, but it is helpful to revisit the concepts with a more painful example.
Many people also think that non-resistance means putting up with whatever is happening to you forever - they would have thought non-resistance means that she should lie in bed for the rest of her life. I hope this example would explain otherwise.
One more example to drill it in and clear up any possible misunderstanding (forgive me if I err on the side of caution). Someone is bound to ask - if a tribe of cannibals is torturing you, is that your life purpose? No - being tortured is what is happening to you, which is very different from what you are doing. Your secondary purpose is to write or fly or whatever, your primary purpose in this moment, to fulfil that, is to get the hell out!
Can you grasp what I am trying to say? It’s the same as the example of my aunt, just on a deeper level. If you can understand it, isn’t it the end of sadness?
For the metaphysically minded (others can ignore the next two paragraphs), another reason she was in such deep pain was her ego. Again, this was covered in detail in the ego post. In fact, we’ve actually been talking about the ego all along - for the ego goes away when you are in the mode of true doing.
Her ego caused her to compare herself and the other women she sees - If everyone around her was fat and alone, would she be suffering so? She wasn’t lacking anything, only her ego told her she was lacking something. Her ego was telling her that she needed to be slim and married to be happy. In the end, Byron Katie helped the poor woman see past the ego. I think, and hope, she has found some genuine peace.
Another error people make (unless they’ve read Part 3) is the idea that their highest good is external. Often times the highest good is internal - a sense of happiness, a sense of peace. Why do you want to be in love? So you can feel happy.
If your highest good is an internal state, you can achieve it by removing the ego as covered in the ego post. In that state, all the external things, lower on the pyramid, would be mere “icing on the cake”.
UrbanMonk.Net provides comprehensive articles for your personal development - modern life, entwined with ancient spirituality.
Get the latest posts free via Email or RSS.(What does Subscribing / RSS mean?)














15 Comments, Comment or Ping
Hannah
I’m just so unhappy. I’ve worked and waited my whole life to get friends and a life partner, and have neither. I am a nice person, fun, even independent, though it doesn’t sound like it from this.
May 20th, 2007
Albert
Hi Hannah…did the post help? There is no unhappiness in being alone? Can you try implementing that concept? Maybe if you tried the ego post, it would help. Please give it a shot and let me know how you go.
May 20th, 2007
Hannah
I can’t find that part. There is plenty of unhappiness in being alone! Sure, it’s great if it’s not true. If you’ve got someone to come home to when you wish to.
May 23rd, 2007
Albert
Hannah, if I may suggest a few things:
1) being with someone doesn’t necessarily make you happier, in fact if you are pinning all your hopes on them, hoping that they will make you happy then it is far easier to get hurt. Nobody is perfect, and even the most sweet, understanding man cannot necessarily love you the way you want to be loved. So if you are looking for a man to take away your unhappiness you’re bound to get hurt…i’m not saying that to be mean…but when you look for a partner to take away your unhappiness, then it’s not true love, it’s more a clinginess or neediness, and that almost never ends up good. So if you go out and develop your social skills and find a man, which you can do, it won’t really matter anyway - the clinginess (which isn’t wrong by the way, 99% of people are like thaT) just means that any relationship will be full of ups and downs.
2) So the best way is to be happy alone. Few ways to do this - go out and find a passion, so that you almost have no time for a man, and that you love having time to do those things. Once you have a great life and are happy on your own, a lover will be more “icing on the cake”. And paradoxically you’ll be way more attractive to any potentials.
3) Another way to be happy alone is to give yourself the love that you are looking for. I have been in your shoes before (for many years in fact), so I know what I’m talking about, in the 2 points above as well. I believe in the end, no one can give you the love you want except yourself. The ego post will explain more.
4) I think you’ll probably need to start with the ego post. It is the ego that says you need to be with someone to be happy.. the ego post is here…
http://tinyurl.com/2gqehn
(I used tinyurl.com because my actual URL was too long and looks crap breaking out of the borders, but don’t worry it’s a link to another post on my site, and not some rip off)
Hope it helps, please feel free to leave comments or email me after if you still need clarification after the ego post.
May 23rd, 2007
Kara-Leah Masina
I liked this post, a lot. The concept of happiness lying in the doing resonates with me.
As a yoga teacher, and of course practitioner… I am aware it’s so easy to fall into the desire of trying to ‘do’ the perfect pose… always looking forward to the moment when you’ll finally master it.
But then what?
There is always another variation to take you on…
So then you’ll want to master that…
No, in my practice now, I release my achieving mind and just en-joy BEING in the pase, feeling how it is today, listening to what it has to tell me…
And therein lies happiness…
May 24th, 2007
Mahatma
I’ve just fallen into your blog a couple of days ago, and have been reading it intently since then, thank you for all this effort. i went through a lot of disappointments lately and discovered a lot of what you say true about my ego,my need to be loved, appreciated, noticed etc. but i have a question:
1) How can i find such a passion that will make me love myself. I’m a mother, loved by my husband and kids, happily settled. I read a lot, write, and help people, do charity work, and love it all, but still cant find the feeling of passion where i lose myself in it and love my self with no need for people to see or appreciate me.
2) isnt there a danger that in finding this “passion”my happiness will be attached to it? and i’ll be in the ego game again?
3) if my ego calls me to do ‘Good” but i doubt it wants the appreciation, should i stop the act, or do it?
4) final Q: why do you do all this service on the blog? is it a mission you are willing to spend soo much time on, or is it a business, or both? the reason i ask, is i’d like to understand the person behind the words and relate more to what you say.
thanks
Feb 20th, 2008
Albert
Hey there Mahatma!
Thanks for your kind words. Regarding your questions…
1) I don’t know for sure as that is not my area of expertise, but I have a post half written on it….it’ll be up in a week or so, it might give you some ideas, I hope
2) I wouldn’t worry so much about the ego, it’s not some kind of enemy, it’s just a belief system that has dominated our lives.
3) Nothing wrong with doing good, I think.
4) More on this on my about page, but it’s a mixture of everything - helping others, speeding my own journey, and also an ambition to be a professional blogger. The percentages that make it all up change all the time.
Thanks for the comment!
Feb 21st, 2008
Reply to “Stepping into greatness and out of unhappiness with dynamic goals - Aristotle and Ego Series.”
Do not waste your time. If you are promoting a product, keyword stuffing, or plain rude, your comment will simply be deleted. Opposing viewpoints are always welcome, but please keep it classy.
DoFollow. Due to all the spammers, comments are now only Dofollow after a secret number of entries.