6 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. Wow! You must have gotten a lot of comments from people like me, because on reading Part One, I was determined to banish this monster from my head. I appreciate what you’ve told me, and at the same time, I want to poke you with sharp sticks because I now have to go through the much more difficult process of loving something which has caused me so much difficulty throughout my life.

    Wish me luck.

  2. Hehehe! You’ve posted this just in time for part 3, the final in the series. I’m going to post in an hour or so, just going through final editing. It is easy to get frustrated and think it’s a chore, but it’s not - as you’ll see in part 3!

    Thanks for commenting!

  3. Algeristo

    I’ve studies 3 of Tolle’s books and some other books and blogs and things that talk about the ego and consciousness, but not one has explained it as clearly and lucidly (and with pictures!) as you. I very much appreciate it that you wrote all those thousands of words about the ego in the original post and then this follow-up. I feel as though the negative things in my life situation don’t affect me some much anymore as they used to.

    I’m feeling closer to enlightenment every day (if there is such a thing) :D

  4. Algeristo, thank you so much! Tolle was a big influence in this series, as well as names like Alan Watts, Nitin Trasi, Krishnamurti and Sanaya Roman. Heavy reading, but just some names if you want to explore some more. I am glad there is a difference in your life, it’s very encouraging to me as a blogger!

  5. I’m also reading Tolle, but at the same time working on a 12-step program for Adult Children of Alcoholics. This post shows me that the two paths are compatible: in ACA, we learn of the “inner child” whose needs were not met, and the solution of developing an “inner parent” to take care of ourselves the way we weren’t taken care of (so that we don’t seek to fill this hole through addictions or unrealistic expectations of romantic relationships).

    I see you writing about the ego as “baby self,” as something that developed to protect us, and it definitely resonates with the “inner child” concept, all the way to thanking it and loving it, the way an “inner parent” would do.

    In ACA, the “inner child” is a dysfunctional version of an “authentic self” that was not allowed to grow. And the “inner parent” is the awareness of that dysfunction.

    Am I understanding correctly if I say that the egoic “baby self” is merely a thwarted “authentic self?” And/or, an “authentic self” that has adapted to an environment of fear?

    I guess I’m confused that we could be born with a true self,it gets shaped by our experiences and ends up relating to egoic time rather than the present, and yet somewhere, without realizing it, an “aware” self still remains. Where is that “aware self” when the ego/inner child/baby self is forming? If the “aware self” is not the mind, why should this “awareness” only develop when we are intellectually mature?

    Sorry for all the questions - I understand if you don’t have time to fully respond. Thank you for this post in any case.

  6. Hey there Elaine - as I write this, my understanding of the ego has sort of changed…it’s moved towards the more non-dualistic understanding of the ego. This post was written inspired by a different system, so I’ll have to write from the perspective of two different systems.

    One - the ACA version is correct when viewed in terms of certain models of psychology. I.e. we have a true / authentic self, and certain events have thwarted it or have not allowed it to grow. This often leads to subpersonalities - i.e. why I behave a certain way with my friends and differently with my bosses. Each subpersonality almost has its own set of beliefs. Integrating and allowing each subpersonality / baby self it’s voice will allow us to come out as a mature individual. The ego is therefore made up of all these different subpersonalities, each of which is pulling us in a different direction (a mature one saying we shouldn’t eat fried chicken, it’s unhealthy, and an immature one saying let’s go eat some right now)

    Which leads to the question: What is the true self? That is a fantastic question. Is it possible that there never was a true self to begin with? There never was an I to begin with?

    That the ego is just a belief that has been ingrained in us? A child behaves in a certain way because it believes in Santa. In the same way, the body and mind might behave in a certain way because it believes in the ego, which is a belief we are separate from the rest of the world.

    This leads right into non-duality which I am still learning about and therefore could be wrong, so I hesitate to write more: Kenton Whitman’s site at here will have more.

    Practically, I would say that if you don’t want to jump into a whole new system, just continue with the ACA. Love and heal the inner child, for it often represents what you really want.

    Hope that makes sense…I’m trying to integrate two different ways of thinking here.

Reply to “Hating the ego: Why discovering the ego can make you more unhappy, Part 2”

Do not waste your time. If you are promoting a product, keyword stuffing, or plain rude, your comment will simply be deleted. Opposing viewpoints are always welcome, but please keep it classy.


DoFollow. Due to all the spammers, comments are now only Dofollow after a secret number of entries.

Search